THE VERY PURPOSE OF "DATE OF PASSING" SLOT IN PROMOTION TO ITI IN THE EXISTING RECRUITMENT RULE IS DEFEATED. BUT ONE SHOULD KNOW THAT " CABINET APPROVED THE CR WITHIN THE EXISTING RR" SUBCOMMITTEE CAN NOT DEVIATE THE CABINET APPROVAL.
I have passed the departmental examination for ITI's in the year 1999, and awaiting for promotion @ 30s in serial. Now what about my position. This is wrong. CABINET APPROVED THIS RESTRUCTURE TO BE IN EXISTING RECRUITMENT RULES. There is no other way except to knock the CAT or SC on this legal perflixity.
The department should give honor to the judgment dated 02/09/1998 of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Chief Commissioner (Admn.) & Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vs. K.C. Sharma &Ors [1998] INSC 454 in which the department itself has won in respect of giving equal weightage in promotion for passing seniority and normal seniority. Otherwise the employees will compelled to file a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court for violation of Articles 14 and 16 of constitution of India. Because most of juniors have got promotion due to passing seniority and now turns are for them who are on the verge of promotion very soon as per their passing seniority.
PROMOTION TO ITI SHOULD ALSO BE ON THE BASIS OF YEAR OF PASSING AS EARLIER.
ReplyDeleteCABINET APPROVED THE CADRE RESTRUCTURE BE IN EXISTING RR. HOW CAN OUR SUBCOMMITTEE VIOLATE THIS. LET US SEE IN COURTS.
ReplyDeleteTHE VERY PURPOSE OF "DATE OF PASSING" SLOT IN PROMOTION TO ITI IN THE EXISTING RECRUITMENT RULE IS DEFEATED. BUT ONE SHOULD KNOW THAT " CABINET APPROVED THE CR WITHIN THE EXISTING RR" SUBCOMMITTEE CAN NOT DEVIATE THE CABINET APPROVAL.
ReplyDeleteI have passed the departmental examination for ITI's in the year 1999, and awaiting for promotion @ 30s in serial. Now what about my position. This is wrong.
ReplyDeleteCABINET APPROVED THIS RESTRUCTURE TO BE IN EXISTING RECRUITMENT RULES. There is no other way except to knock the CAT or SC on this legal perflixity.
The department should give honor to the judgment dated 02/09/1998 of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Chief Commissioner (Admn.) & Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vs. K.C. Sharma &Ors [1998] INSC 454 in which the department itself has won in respect of giving equal weightage in promotion for passing seniority and normal seniority. Otherwise the employees will compelled to file a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court for violation of Articles 14 and 16 of constitution of India. Because most of juniors have got promotion due to passing seniority and now turns are for them who are on the verge of promotion very soon as per their passing seniority.
ReplyDelete