It is known to everybody that CR file has been sent to F.M. via Revenue Secy. about two weeks ago. After that there is no official status update. The associations are either in dark or they don't want to share anything publicly. It is learnt from sources that F.M. has approved the CR file and it is now on the way to return to CBDT. It is also learnt that official implementation order is likely to be issued within this week itself. CBDT is also going to issue a guideline for implementation of DOPT order dated 4th March regarding inter se seniority with reference to the clarification obtained by Dept. of Legal Affairs (DOLA), which was obtained last week.
It may kindly be remembered that the status update reg CR mentioned above is not authenticated by any official source. As we are being flooded with queries from the viewers, whatever information could be gathered, published above. Please do not take it for granted and wait for next update.
It may kindly be remembered that the status update reg CR mentioned above is not authenticated by any official source. As we are being flooded with queries from the viewers, whatever information could be gathered, published above. Please do not take it for granted and wait for next update.
Is it a genuine news ?
ReplyDeleteDear author, plese dont post speculation news. be honest and express only after confirming at some minimum level.
ReplyDeleteSome news is better than no news.
ReplyDeleteYes, anybody is know nothing. Accept simple incometax.
ReplyDeletewe believe you. please update time to time and be honest.
ReplyDeleteSachai Ye hai ki jab tak neta Log hai CR final nahi ho sakti,neta logo ne Revenue Secretary ko letter likhkar CR Ko rukwa diya hai ,File abhi Board me hi hai,FM ke pas file jab jaiege jab Ye neta chahege or yehchahege agla itef ka election 2015 Jitna ,yani. 2014 December tak CR final ho jaegi
ReplyDeleteThanks for the update.We are getting at least some news here, and most of the cases it becomes true. Hope the news also becomes true.
ReplyDeleteNew rumor ?
ReplyDeleteHard to believe !
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your information. Could you please give any information about the new recruitment rules? Whether date of passing for promotion to ITI has been retained or abolished?
ReplyDeleteI wish all the employees of the Department 'ALL THE BEST'.
Surprised? By-the-by where is F.M.Whether in India or else where?
ReplyDeleteIs there any chance of promotion as ITO since there is stay in CAT and contempt of court is pending in Supreme Court for non implementing of Verdit N.R. Parmar
ReplyDeletewhat union will do now
ReplyDeleteU r another asanje running vikiliks.
ReplyDeleteThe DoPT Om 4.3.2014 has no sanctity and it was prepared just to take a plea before the Supreme court that by telling that we have accepted the judgement and as if all the states have already followed strictly to the DoPT OM 3.7.86 and as there may not be required to review in accordance with NR permar case. But the DoPT again went into back ie DoPT OM 1959 which was already struck down by the Supreme court and then only the DoPT has issued OM 2.7.86.Before issuing any OM the DoPT should approach the solicitor general of India as these OM are to be followed by 180 central govt departments EXCEPT DIFFENCE DEPTT.
ReplyDeleteWhy ITEF is silent on approval of CR by the F.M?? What they are going to do now??
ReplyDeleteThanks simpleincome tax for providing updates
ReplyDeleteसवको अपनी अपनी जरुरतो की याद है कोई नेता यह नही सोच रहा है कि किसी तरह से इन दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारियों को इनका हक दिलाया जाये
ReplyDelete,
डीओपीटी ने सभी विभागो से 31.10.2013 तक के सभी दैनिक वेतन भोगी कर्मचारियों की सूची मॉगी है अन्य विभागो से रिपोर्ट डीओपीटी को भेजी जा चुकी है परन्तु आयकर विभागो से अभी तक नही दी गयी है इसका क्या मतलब है नेता जी ?
It is confirmed that In proposed RR approved by the Board for ITI ,list according to date or year of passing, has been abolished . Hence, promotion will be made as per one list prepared seniority wise of passed candidates only.U can see draft RR available on Net.
ReplyDeleteThere is no movement of cadre review file..and the revenue secretary has again gone on leave till 11th march (after recent one week leave)..one thing is sure that the file has not yet been approved by the FM....
ReplyDeletelunch hour demonestration was utter failure in our AP charge with itef virtually opposed the so called jca i.e all powerful itgoa..we expect the same in future from itef..
ReplyDeleteNow itef,ap opposing jca call? what next? by the way what does jca and itef, ap want?
ReplyDeleteAP wants discussion b4 unilaterally calling for demonistrations n non_cooperation...jca shuld b for evrybody..not for itgoa..
DeleteMy doubt is when a notional seniority is not counted for pay,pension,gratuity etc then why it is working out for claim of seniority. For promotees, the seniority starts from the date of joining in the said cadre but whereas for DRs, the DoPT is granting seniority from the date of notification. Where is the equality of opportunity .Is not the infringement of fundamental rights. My doubt is whether CBDT or SSC are exempted from the violation of article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India in appointing Direct recruits beyond the advertising vacancies and why these two institutions are only do not take care of the Supreme court rulings in the case of Assam public service commission and the latest February 2014 in the matter of public appointments. In number of cases, the supreme court ruled that notional seniority could not be given without born in the said cadre. Why the doPT is not looking into this ruling. Why they are inviting again PIL from serving employees. All serving employees are dullest candidates and because of this, the drama of NR permar case is continuing.
ReplyDeletefile gum ho gayi kaya? please find out the most wanted file thanks
ReplyDeleteSSC in its notification always states that "exact numbere of vacancies will be determined in due course" in other words vacancies declared are not final and likely to change. so don't be disheartened
ReplyDeleteTheek se padha karo. Sirf 5 vacancy the aur 818 logo ko bhare. Desh ke navjawanoo ke saath vishwas ghaat kiya.
DeleteWhile everybody is waiting with bated breath for outcome of CR, Region-wise allocation, DoPT Om dt 4th Mar 14 vis-a-vis Apex Court order, the Dept is well aware of what is lying ahead. It is gearing up for the numerous litigation cases that will be cropping up. It has started the process for empanelment of lawyers to handle service rule related issues in the forum of courts and CAT
ReplyDeleteDISSOLVE ITEF. IT IS USELESS, CORRUPT AND ANTI STAFF.
ReplyDeleteThe leaders of itef r elected by us only. Vote them out or jhelte raho.
ReplyDeletesame is the case of ITEF.AP Dissolve it. It is useless association anti Members, Pro administration. Sack this association.
ReplyDeleteMember (A & J) visited Lucknow today and information from reliable sources that Cadre review file with the FM for approval and hope upto 25th of this month.
ReplyDelete-Akhilesh Srivastava
Lucknow
Please do not blame ITEF because of some lack in leadership and do not think from your mind set, if you think so, definitely you were not the best leader. Only AP ITEF has struggled for natural justice and did a good job for the association and for getting good number of posts with submission of detailed analysys with covering all details litterally without any help from the administration. Please do not try to devide ITEF otherwise, we will also on par with Central excise association. In 180 central government deptt, ITEF is the strongest association and it recognised one.
ReplyDeleteWith regard to NR permar case, the so called DRs said to have been of 2005 batch are worried about implementation early with a view that they will fall in the said category. In AP, the High court ruled that only 5 advertised vacancies are eligible to get seniority from 2005 notification. My request to promotees of diferent states move to their high court and file appeal or PIL. How the subsequent notified vacancies are filled up with previous year of notification and without advertising the said vacancies which were received by SSC after closing of recruitment process ie April 2006. The CBDT has notified has sent requisition to SSC in December 2006 - 59 posts and Fevruary 2007 749 posts.But these DRs in any way are not falls in DoPT 2.7.86 and 3.7.86 and NR permar case. Basically their recruitment is illegal.
ReplyDeleteIf there was only 5 vacancy for DR, then as per RR, It should have been 10 for PR. Then how 150 were promoted in MUMBAI.
DeleteDear DR ok 150 PR will be demoted but then 817 INTRUDERS are they ready to go home being back door appointments. Give the answer now. None the less get ready refresh yr bio data that will help u.FORGET NR PARMAR IT IS HISTORY NOW N THAT IS CLEAR. Concentrate on saving yr kursi than NRP implementation which is NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER going to happen that easily.
Deleteyes..itef is useless for those who demands promotion on d basis of fictious seniority...for rest of d people itef is like an umbrella which saves us from admin ovr reach...
ReplyDelete@akhilesh..is FM in Lucknow?
ReplyDeleteIf the CR is going to be implemented soon then the would be beneficiaries should protest for its implementation from the date of its announcement keeping in view the NRP matter.
ReplyDeleteNo CR, but ladthe raho! ladthe raho
ReplyDeletePlease dont say AP leadership fought for natural justice. It completely lacks integrity and accountability. It signs circulars calling for non-cooperation and demonstration but it does not happen
ReplyDeleteSarkari kaam kaise aur kitna latak sakte hain ..dekh lo
ReplyDeleteKindly keep us informed about the CR. The actual position. Whether it is or it will be approved by the FM.
ReplyDeletethak thak koi hai. Jara update karo na please
ReplyDeleteWhat is benefit of CR without implementing decision in NRP case. Can anyone explain when it will be implementing.
ReplyDeleteSome of the ITGOA people are thinking that the NR permar case is applicable to the Inspectors only. It is not true. First the Judgement said that IN THE INSTANT CASE . 2nd, what the principal laid down in DoPT Om dated 2.7.86 and 3.7.86. 3rd Not only the requisition but also the advertisement is required to apply the doPT OM 2.7.86 and 3.7.86. That mean to say, the principal applicability for all cadres but not to alone of one cadre. If they think that it is applicable to only ITIs then also they have to think that the supreme court says IN THE INSTANT CASE. ie the appellants are only but not the whole cadre or whole department.
ReplyDeleteN r parmar order says that during the year ki vacancy during the year arise ho gayee during the year SSC ko notify kee gayi during the year advertised kee gayee aur during the year exam ho gaya.yeh sab ek hi financial year meh hona chahiyee tho hi NRP lagoo honga nahi tho get lost. Koi back log vacancy nahi chaiyee. 2005-06 me koi vacancy report ki gayee 2006-07 me sirf 05 vacancies report kee gayi aur uske against 817 gade bhare gaye. Tho kidar se NRP lagoo honga. Sirf 5 ko milenga NRP ka....baqee ghar jayoo aur naya CV tyaar karo kaam ayenga.
Deleten r parmer have to be implemented, no other option left to anyone, just watch
ReplyDeleteWhat to watch. Watch mine.
Deleteone has commented that it is usual practice of SSC without advertising vaancies with a rider saying that posts mayincrease or decrease. It is not suffice before the court of law. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 979 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 26090 of 2011) Renu & Ors.
ReplyDeleteNew Delhi; DATE OF ORDER: February 12, 2014.
Correct 100 percent.
Deleteas per CIVIL APPEAL NO. 979 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 26090 of 2011) Renu & Ors.
ReplyDeleteNew Delhi; DATE OF ORDER: February 12, 2014. "35. In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of with the
following directions:
i) All High Courts are requested to re-examine the statutory rules
dealing with the appointment of staff in the High Court as well
as in the subordinate courts and in case any of the rule is not inconformity and consonance with the provisions of Articles 14
and 16 of the Constitution, the same may be modified.
ii) To fill up any vacancy for any post either in the High Court or
in courts subordinate to the High Court, in strict compliance of
the statutory rules so made. In case any appointment is made in
contravention of the statutory rules, the appointment would be
void ab-initio irrespective of any class of the post or the person
occupying it.
iii) The post shall be filled up by issuing the advertisement in at
least two newspapers and one of which must be in vernacular language having wide circulation in the respective State. In
addition thereto, the names may be requisitioned from the local
employment exchange and the filled up without advertising as prescribed hereinabove, shall be
void ab-initio and would remain unenforceable and
inexecutable except such appointments which are permissible to
be filled up without advertisement, e.g., appointment on
compassionate grounds as per the rules applicable. Before any vacancies may be advertised by
other modes also e.g. Employment News, etc. Any vacancy filled up without advertising as prescribed hereinabove, shall be
void ab-initio and would remain unenforceable and
inexecutable except such appointments which are permissible to candidates should be screened/tested while adhering to the
reservation policy adopted by the State, etc., if any.
iv) Each High Court may examine and decide within six months
from today as to whether it is desirable to have centralised
selection of candidates for the courts subordinate to the
respective High Court and if it finds it desirable, may formulate
the rules to carry out that purpose either for the State or on
Zonal or Divisional basis.
v) The High Court concerned or the subordinate court as the case
may be, shall undertake the exercise of recruitment on a regular
basis at least once a year for existing vacancies or vacan
be filled up without advertisement, e.g., appointmappointment is made, the eligibility as well as suitability of allent on
compassionate grounds as per the rules applicable. Before any ncies
that are likely to occur within the said period, so that the
vacancies are filled up timely, and thereby avoiding any
inconvenience or shortage of staff as it will also control the
menace of ad-hocism.
36. Before parting with the case, we record our deep appreciation to