All the Income Tax offices throughout the country remained closed on Thursday, the 8th October, 2015 in response to a call for a one day strike, jointly issued by the Income Tax Employees Federation and the Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association.
Leaders will take stock of the situation on 11th October and decide further course of action.
Today a press statement has been issued by JCA.
Click here to view the Press Release.
Leaders will take stock of the situation on 11th October and decide further course of action.
Today a press statement has been issued by JCA.
Click here to view the Press Release.
Need to intensify ongoing agitation immediately . Non participation in search/survey, stopage of recovery work , non disposal of scrutiny cases, etc should be considered for this purpose alongwith a call for indefinite strike.
ReplyDeleteSarkar mauke ki talash me hai.Agle saal exemption limit badha kar downsizing shuru ho sakti hai.Bina soche samajhe hartal karne se sabka nukasan ho sakta hai.
ReplyDeleteHRD should be headed by a IAS so that these partisan IRS officer's attitude towards non IRS be stopped.
ReplyDeleteWho said that offices were closed.In delhi all offices were opened and running beautifully.Even CA's attended assessment proceedings. DR IRS officers know how to manage things.So movement has to be intensified.Need to stop survey and search action.We should say ki we will not do assessment. All cases should be transferred to Circle.
ReplyDeleteDirect IRS are the boss and bosses are always right
DeleteIf govt call for negotiations, one issue should be emphasised i.e.
ReplyDeleteWhy CBDT do not follow DOPT calendar for DPC? and fix responsibility individually on "Chairperson" or Pr.CCIT(CCA) if they do not conduct DPC as per DOPT calendar. As per DOPT calendar DPC for Vacancy Year 2014-15 should have been held in March 2014. Nobody can deny that CBDT is in default for not following DOPT calendar.
CBDT may give excuse that reason for delay is implementation of NRP. It can be refuted saying that Supreme Court decision pronounced on Nov-2012 and how much time it needed to implement. 3 years are 10 times more than required to implement NRP.
If JCA achieve in fixing responsibility individually for not conducting DPC as per DOPT Calendar, It will solve a big problem related to timely promotion.
My dear sir or madam please inform as to how to implement N R P decision uniformingly all over the country.
DeleteIt is headache of CBDT, we are concered with timely DPC only
DeleteDo u mean to say that CBDT should fix seniority of gr. D or LDC also.
DeleteNon participation in survey search TDS inspections survey to be included in our agitation.
ReplyDeleteDirect IRS are Lords. They can even take their car drivers and conduct searches or surveys.
DeleteWork to rule should also be included in the agitation. No work after office hours, Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Outsiders should be barred from doing office work.
ReplyDeleteITGOA should consider filing of Writ petition and contempt against CBDT for not following the DOPT calendar for DPC, which was prepared on the instance of the Supreme Court.
ReplyDeleteVery good suggestion. Now we should explore legal remedy also
DeleteYes brother bilkul sahi
DeleteCbdt will fart over the writ petition
DeletePrincipal bench of CAT directed to consider chain vacancy of Cadre Restructuring in Vacancy Year 2014-15. Mumbai & Pune Region considered chain vacancy in v.y. 2013-14
ReplyDeleteCentral Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench, New Delhi
O.A. No.3879/2014
Thursday, this the 24th day of September, 2015
Hon ble Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Member (J)
Hon ble Dr. B. K. Sinha, Member (A)
Priya Ranjan
s/o Mr. Rajnandan Yadav Pankaj ,
Aged about 39 years
r/o House No.6, Narmada Towers
Sector-4, Vaishali
Ghaziabad
Present post Income Tax Inspector
O/o DGIT (INU) N.D.
..Applicant
(Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate)
Versus
1. Union of India through Secretary
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
North Block, New Delhi-1
2. Central Board of Direct Taxes
Through its Chairman
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue, North Block
New Delhi-1
3. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
3rd Floor, CR Building
IP Estate, New Delhi-2
4. Principal DGIT-HRD
Directorate of Income Tax
Human Resource Development
ICADR Building, Plot No.6
Vasant Kunj Institutional Area, Phase II
New Delhi-70
..Respondents
(Mr. Rajesh Katyal, Advocate)
O R D E R (ORAL)
Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj:
The only prayer made in the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is for issuance of direction to the respondents to consider the 18 posts of ITO in Delhi Region for the vacancy year 2014-15. The prayer reads thus:-
(a) Call for the records of the case;
(b) Declare that the 18 posts/vacancies of ITOs in Delhi Region which have arisen as a result of promotion order dated 10th September, 2014 are posts and vacancies of the year 2014-15 only.
(c) Direct the respondents to fill up the said 18 posts/vacancies of ITOs as the vacancies of the year 2014-15 forthwith in Delhi Region.
(d) Direct the respondents to consider and promote the applicant as ITOs against the said 18 posts/vacancies of ITOs in Delhi Region/ Charge.
(e) Direct the respondents to give all consequential benefits to the applicants including arrears of pay and allowances;
(f) Cost of the Original Application may be awarded in favour of the Applicant and justice may be done.
2. Mr. Rajesh Katyal, learned counsel for respondents produced a copy of communication F.No.P-311/CAT/KK/2014-15/1076 dated 24.9.2015 addressed by the Office of Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi to him. In the communication, it has been amplified that the competent authority has taken a decision to consider 18 chain vacancies of ITO formed subject matter of controversy in the Original Application as the vacancies of the year 2014-15. Paragraph 2 of the communication reads thus:
2. In this regard, I am directed to convey that the competent authority in this office has taken a decision to consider the 18 chain vacancies of ITOs under contention in the year 2014-15. I am further directed to take leave of the Court on holding DPC of ITOs for the year 2013-14 as the restriction imposed by the Hon ble CAT in this case also applies in another case in OA No.4334/2014 (Rajesh Kumar Gupta & Ors Vs UOOI & Ors.)
3. In view of the stand taken by the respondents, the Original Application is disposed of as infructuous. In view of the final Order passed (ibid), the interim Order dated 26.11.2014 stands vacated. No costs.
( Dr. B.K. Sinha ) ( A.K. Bhardwaj )
Member (A) Member (J)
September 24, 2015
/sunil/
Yeh order ke kyajhaat Honga ?
ReplyDeleteBus kuchh log revert hokar inspector banenge
Deleteplease can any body inform what was the result of the to day's meeting of JCA in respect of agitation.
ReplyDeleteAnshan will soon be held at jantaar mantaar for from ITO TO ACT (promotee ) please await further circular from IT GOA.
ReplyDeleteNo use of strike. CBDT ko kuchh padi nahi hai regarding promotee ACIT. In Mumbai region search and surveys are in full swing. Inspectors(both promotee and direct) ko mal chahiye.
ReplyDelete