After the DPC held yesterday, Kolkata issued promotion order for 18 Inspectors to the post of I.T.O after revising seniority list as per "Parmar" instruction. With the revision in the seniority list from 05-06, not a single promotee inspector could find place in the list. These vacancies were created by way of retirement and consequential to ACIT promotion earlier. It may be mentioned that Kolkata is denied from any additional post of ITO in this restructuring.
View the ITO Promotion Order
View the Sr P.S. Promotion Order
View the A.O. Gr-II Promotion Order
Congratulation to all newly promoted officers !
View the ITO Promotion Order
View the Sr P.S. Promotion Order
View the A.O. Gr-II Promotion Order
Congratulation to all newly promoted officers !
25 comments:
itefkerala.com reports Kerala HC decision to the effect that those LDCs upgraded as TAs are eligible for the scale of STAs when first ACP is granted. This decision would help all those LDCs who were upgraded as TAs. Pls publish it in your blog to the benefit of all.
In the revised seniority list there are many seniors inspecotr who did not pass the officership exam.
NER missed the date.
Pr.CCIT kolkata also issued LDC promotion order on 05-06-2014. Pl.Give the order on your sight.
IN ITI TO ITO PROMOTION NO SC/ST CANDIDATES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND WITHOUT MAINTAINING 200 POINT ROOSTER WHICH IS BAD AS PER LAW
what about RY 2014-15. any news?
Bangalore PRs Hard luck...Get Ready for reversion after CAT order today...
Do u think that is so easy ? How much experience u hv in govt service ?
ITGOA AND ITEF of bengal circle ARE BETRAYED PROMOTEES IN ITOS PROMOTION.
Ad.VII, CBDT issued letter to implement NRP on 06.06.14...still no reversion in Bangalore…..its open challenge...Stop reversion if u can...time limit is also 15 days....all due to Brainless PR CCIT...When prescribed rule / law is there experience hardly matters Sir...Just check….if less experienced staff is correct / wrong...
It is not the number of years of service which matters but the level at which you have served which matters.Will realise after seeing the CAT bangalore's orders.
Can you pl upload the letter of AD VII cbdt dated 6.6.14
It is shame for the unions of West Bengal region. Shame ! for CCA Kolkata who could not manage/ or denied clandestinely a single post for ITO. Shame ! Shame! to Core committee of CR who has denied legitimate rights of the employees of West Bengal region.
Cannot appoint more than vacancies advertised: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India, in a recent decision, has restated the law of the land that it is not permissible for the Government to hand out more appointments than the vacancies that are advertised. The Court noted that the law had been settled by a number of decisions of the Supreme Court itself that it was against the law and also the rights of others to appoint more people than the vacancies advertised. The decision notes as under;It is a settled legal proposition that vacancies cannot be filled up over and above the number of vacancies advertised as “the recruitment of the candidates in excess of the notified vacancies is a denial and deprivation of the constitutional right under Article 14 read with Article 16(1) of the Constitution”, of those persons who acquired eligibility for the post in question in accordance with the statutory rules subsequent to the date of notification of vacancies. Filling up the vacancies over the notified vacancies is neither permissible nor desirable, for the reason, that it amounts to “improper exercise of power and only in a rare and exceptional circumstance and in emergent situation, such a rule can be deviated and such a deviation is permissible only after adopting policy decision based on some rational”, otherwise the exercise would be arbitrary. Filling up of vacancies over the notified vacancies amounts to filling up of future vacancies and thus, not permissible in law. (Vide Union of India & Ors. v. Ishwar Singh Khatri & Ors. (1992) Supp 3 SCC 84; Gujarat State Deputy Executive Engineers’ Association v. State of Gujarat & Ors. (1994) Supp 2 SCC 591; State of Bihar & Ors. v. The Secretariat Assistant S.E. Union 1986 & Ors AIR 1994 SC 736; Prem Singh & Ors. v. Haryana State Electricity Board & Ors. (1996) 4 SCC 319; and Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. Chairman, Banking Service Recruitment Board & Ors. AIR 1996 SC 976).
In Surinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors. AIR 1998 SC 18, this Court held as under: “A waiting list prepared in an examination conducted by the Commission does not furnish a source of recruitment. It is operative only for the contingency that if any of the selected candidates does not join then the person from the waiting list may be pushed up and be appointed in the vacancy so caused or if there is some extreme exigency the Government may as a matter of policy decision pick up persons in order of merit from the waiting list. But the view taken by the High Court that since the vacancies have not been worked out properly, therefore, the candidates from the waiting list were liable to be appointed does not appear to be sound. This practice, may result in depriving those candidates who become eligible for competing for the vacancies available in future. If the waiting list in one examination was to operate as an infinite stock for appointment, there is a danger that the State Government may resort to the device of not holding an examination for years together and pick up candidates from the waiting list as and when required. The constitutional discipline requires that this Court should not permit such improper exercise of power which may result in creating a vested interest and perpetrate waiting list for the candidates of one examination at the cost of entire set of fresh candidates either from the open or even from service…..Exercise of such power has to be tested on the touchstone of reasonableness….It is not a matter of course that the authority can fill up more posts than advertised.”
PR ITIs of all regions are appealed to file writ petition before High Court of the respective charges for the invalid appointment of the DR ITIs of 2005 batch. when the appointment is valid then the question of seniority is not raised.
Unless, ITEF initiates quick steps by approaching the Board to fill all the vaccant posts by giving one time relaxation, many staff will suffer in the yoke of Parmar case. Hence, our ITEF leaders to focus on this issue urgently. This is the crucial time, ITEF should work for the benefits of all the existing staffs,otherwise, ITEF will be good for nothing. All are requested to comment on this issue please. We are always with ITEF.
KOLKATA region is so sympatetic and concerned about women outside their home region that they go out of the way to bring them to kolkata region but is equally insignificant about Ex-servicemen who are serving outside their home region after serving in defence for 20 years. Kolkata region doesn't even bother to reply to their applications.
First of all learn how to write correct english before criticising others.
Please check your advertisement for UDC
2005 batch ki vacancy 2001 se 2004 05 tak ki caryy forward vacancies hai jo aap jaise great pr kabhi report hi nhi karte.. Fight for justice is always welcome. Plz be updated with all the facts then go to higher court... else u will spoil ur time and money.... When demand for NRP IS MADE THEN ILLEGAL IF LEAVE THE DEMAND THEN LEGAL.... HAI NA pehle se kahan so rahe the...
where is the order of ITIs? on what basis Pr CCIT is not issued order of ITIs? it should be come to the knowledge of board that on whom order or according to which rule it is stayed yet?
Dear knowledgable DR bro pl read cbdt letter dt 20.2.2007 carefully and also read NRP judgement carefully. Then speak. Pl also ready Rajeev mohan and Renu kumari also carefully. Does NRP permit carry forward post seniority ? the daily wagers are asking for advt.of 817 posts of ITIs from SSC. What reply to be given to them ?
Super great DR of all time. U shd be recommended for planning commission post. Only u hv super brains. Does NRP permit giving seniority to carry forward posts and constitutionally violated illegal back door nuisance DR recruits ( desh-dharti dono pe boj
) ? Then why " beg " for seniority ?
PR Sir jee
aaplog k liye cat ka darwaza khual hai........
And do read Om 86/87 which tells about carry forward vacancy.
NR Parmar was promtee inspecor whose fate u know.....
What SSC will reply it is there concern.
All illegally recruited Dr becoming Ito run fast to
CAT with all da SC order I hv started packing my bag... wish u all da best....
Everyone quit ITEF....
In kolkata recent passed a promotion order no 260 of inspector in which no get any reservation for PH(PWD) 3% reservation inspector post is group c it is right or wrong ?
Post a Comment