"Implementation of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
NR Parmar (CA No. 7514-7515 and others) - Issue of Advisory — Regarding —
**0***********
The matter of drawing up of inter se seniority at the Group C cadres has been delegated to the respective Pr. CCIT(CCA)s by the CBDT. Various disputes relating to inter-se seniority between Direct Recruit (DR) and Promote Recruit (PR) Inspectors of Income Tax (ITI) In certain Pr. CCIT(CCA) Regions had arisen on account of seniority lists prepared by various CCAs. The determination of the year of appointment of a Direct Recruit for purposes of seniority has now been settled by the hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Union of India & others vs NR. Parmar & Others" vide its Order dated 27-11-2012................. "
Click here to view the full guideline
Courtesy : ITGOA W.B.
JCA not satisfied with the advisory, wants amendment
Joint Council of Action of Income Tax, consiss of promotee officers and staff members, not at all satisfied with the above mentioned advisory and wanted immediate amendment.
" Therefore, we request you to immediately issue corrigendum to the present advisory to the effect that the response to point No. 3 is “No, the provisions of the OM dated 7.2.86 and 3.7.86 are applicable in all cadres where the elements of Direct Recruitment and promotion exists”. and also to amend para no. 5 as “ This advisory is being issued for enabling all Pr. CCsIT(CCA) to carry out the process of refixing of Seniority of all cadres where the elements of Direct Recruitment and promotion exists in their regions……”. We are also constrained to inform your goodself, that our members will not be in a position to extend cooperation in the matter to the administration in implementing the directions contained in the above letter to CCAs until necessary amendments are carried out and conveyed to the Cadre Controlling Authorities."
Click here for the response of JCA
NR Parmar (CA No. 7514-7515 and others) - Issue of Advisory — Regarding —
**0***********
The matter of drawing up of inter se seniority at the Group C cadres has been delegated to the respective Pr. CCIT(CCA)s by the CBDT. Various disputes relating to inter-se seniority between Direct Recruit (DR) and Promote Recruit (PR) Inspectors of Income Tax (ITI) In certain Pr. CCIT(CCA) Regions had arisen on account of seniority lists prepared by various CCAs. The determination of the year of appointment of a Direct Recruit for purposes of seniority has now been settled by the hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Union of India & others vs NR. Parmar & Others" vide its Order dated 27-11-2012................. "
Click here to view the full guideline
Courtesy : ITGOA W.B.
JCA not satisfied with the advisory, wants amendment
Joint Council of Action of Income Tax, consiss of promotee officers and staff members, not at all satisfied with the above mentioned advisory and wanted immediate amendment.
" Therefore, we request you to immediately issue corrigendum to the present advisory to the effect that the response to point No. 3 is “No, the provisions of the OM dated 7.2.86 and 3.7.86 are applicable in all cadres where the elements of Direct Recruitment and promotion exists”. and also to amend para no. 5 as “ This advisory is being issued for enabling all Pr. CCsIT(CCA) to carry out the process of refixing of Seniority of all cadres where the elements of Direct Recruitment and promotion exists in their regions……”. We are also constrained to inform your goodself, that our members will not be in a position to extend cooperation in the matter to the administration in implementing the directions contained in the above letter to CCAs until necessary amendments are carried out and conveyed to the Cadre Controlling Authorities."
Click here for the response of JCA
10 comments:
PLEASE READ JUDGEMENT OF N R PARMAR CAREFULLY BEFORE ISSUING IRRELEVANT AND ILLOGICAL CIRCULARS, OM, OPINION, ADVISORY. HASTE IS WASTE.
EVERYBODY IS EQUAL BEFORE LAW.
One day nr parmar case will be history as there is no match of cbdt in lingering the things to the height that people start forgetting.
Item n itgoa shud be declared banned immediately
Very strong response to the board.
DOPT AND HRD SHOULD NOT ADOPT PARTISAN ATTITUDE TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION OF N R PARMAR DECISION. THE DOPT AND HRD OFFICIALS SHOULD ALSO ADVISORY INSTRUCTIONS OMs AND DIRECTIVES TO UNIFORMILY IMPLEMENT DECISIONS OF RAJEEV MOHAN , RENU KUMARI, PATANJALI SHARMA AND UMA DEVI DECISIONS TO ENSURE THAT EVERBODY IS EQUAL BEFORE LAW.
Correct
Can anybody tell what happened today in JCA metting with chairman
10th Oct gone. NRP not implemented by PCCsIT. Even CBDT's order not obeyed. This is height of disobedience.
What the HRD has conveyed is clear violation to the decision of the Apex Court in NRP. JCA stand is appreciable. Let us wait for the clear cut instructions for implementation of the decision in every cadre.
How can NRP be implemented. Hv u read and understood NRP DECISION. ? OR r u adopted by NRP ?
Post a Comment