Monday, October 6, 2014

ITIs exempted from signing attendance in W.B., punctuality tightened for others !

Responding to a long pending demand of ITEF, West Bengal Unit, Pr CCIT, WB & Sikkim finally came out with positive response regarding exemption of putting signature of Inspectors in the attendance register. Based on the recommendation of a committee constituted for this purpose, strict punctuality has been recommended for other staff members.

Click here for the recommendations as circulated with approval of Pr CCIT

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good.
Pl collect ARREAR DEMAND and make a dairy and reduce the demand and submit weekly report accordingly.

Anonymous said...

Tell the ITIs of West Bengal to submit the weekly dairy.

Anonymous said...

Right

Anonymous said...

You obnoxious fellows raise unjust demands which are very often quashed by the CIT Appeals in their appellate orders. So why don't you restrain yourself first to raise such demands by resorting to scrupulous minds loaded with greed and lust, then ask ITls to collect arrears demands.

Anonymous said...

Do you have any locus standii to frame rule (by yourself) for ITIs? Who are you, Chairman of the Board or Revenue Secretary?

Anonymous said...

The hon'ble ITAT has directed the department to refund Rs.11000crores to LICI. Then what is the need for raising such huge tax demands which are very often vacated by the higher forums or court of law? Is there remains any credibility or expertise or justification of our so called assessing officers for creating such huge arrears demands and ask ITIs to collect these disputed demands. These fellows should be considered for prosecution for wasting government stationeries, manpower and most of all valued working hours.

Anonymous said...

Dear anonymous kosh mulo dondo, first try to distinguish between diary and dairy then ask for collection of arrear demands. I have enough doubt whether you have any coception regarding arrear demands and current demand.

Anonymous said...

The Bombay High Court has quashed the decision of burden of tax liability imposed by Transfer Pricing Officer upon Vodafone due to which government is likely to suffer loss to exchequer amounting to Rs.3000 crores. Do my dear Officer commented upon collection of arrear demand by IT Inspectors satisfied with the decision of Bombay High Court? This is the efficacy and expertise of insolvent departmental officers who often raise the question of collection of arrear demands by ITIs beings jealous with the recent decision of Principle CCIT,WB & Sikkim. In my opinion, action should be contemplated against the errant officer in Vodafone case who is responsible for such blunder.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the comments. Very rightly said.

Anonymous said...

My dear friends first learn the ABCD of transfer pricing and then comment. We should not forget that there are cases where decisions of a lower judicial forum which were reversed by higer forum. So first let us all know that in vodafone issue, the issue dealt by TPO is new issue and the same issue crops oup in many cases. The deaprtment has to take a stand till the issue reaches finality. You may be right when an officer raise unnecessary demands which were already dealt years back. Let us not forget that there are officers and staff who strive for the betterment of work culture.

Anonymous said...

Yes, I do agree with your comments. Everyone should learn to adhere to the direction of higher forums till it's finality. So, have patience to hear opinions of others (Of course not dictats, who often proclaims oral circulars for other cadres to do this and that). If you do not have patience to hear from others then keep abstain yourselves first from criticizing other groups of staff till it reaches to it's finality on the grounds of realistic approach towards dealing with day to day business of the department.

Anonymous said...

Yes, Government (I.T.department) has decided not to prefer SLP in Supreme Court against Bombay High Court's order in Vodafone case which involves 3200 crores tax dispute. Dear anonymous lecturer on ABCD of tax does your tax wisdom reaches finality? Should Inspectors collect this arrear demand which does not get a legal validity at all in the highest court of laws? Hope you have got enough lesson today on collection of arrear demand, isn't it?

It may kindly be noted that comments published in this blog are the views of our readers. The administrator of this blog is not responsible in any way regarding the comments and opinions expressed here.
Viewers are requested to post relevant comments only and abstain from making any comment which can hurt any person or group.

My Headlines