"In this regard, I am directed to request that a copy of the seniority list in the cadre of I.T.O. issued post implementation of the N.R Parmar judgement of the Apex Court be sent to
this office by return post."
This is the communication from HRD to all cadre controlling Pr. CCIT issued today, 15th Oct'15.
Click here for the full text of the letter.
The revised seniority list of ITOs after NRP implementation is a very embarrassing issue for JCA, especially ITGOA. In most of the charges the revised list has not be prepared as there may be necessity to revert a few ITOs and many existing ITOs will definitely loose seniority. Some of them now availing the benefit of Grade Pay of Rs 5400 which will be subject to revision as their deemed joining date will be much later date and thus pay may be refixed at Rs 4800 again. To avert the possibility of reversion of a few ITOs ITGOA desperately needed a sizable number of ACIT promotion so that all existing ITOs may be accommodated.
If the reversion takes place, the competence of leadership will certainly be under a big question mark.
Now it is to be seen how JCA leadership tackles the masterstroke of CBDT in the midway of ongoing agitation.
This is the communication from HRD to all cadre controlling Pr. CCIT issued today, 15th Oct'15.
Click here for the full text of the letter.
The revised seniority list of ITOs after NRP implementation is a very embarrassing issue for JCA, especially ITGOA. In most of the charges the revised list has not be prepared as there may be necessity to revert a few ITOs and many existing ITOs will definitely loose seniority. Some of them now availing the benefit of Grade Pay of Rs 5400 which will be subject to revision as their deemed joining date will be much later date and thus pay may be refixed at Rs 4800 again. To avert the possibility of reversion of a few ITOs ITGOA desperately needed a sizable number of ACIT promotion so that all existing ITOs may be accommodated.
If the reversion takes place, the competence of leadership will certainly be under a big question mark.
Now it is to be seen how JCA leadership tackles the masterstroke of CBDT in the midway of ongoing agitation.
Cbdt is on right direction.
ReplyDeleteAre they going to conduct the DPC for ITO to ACIT?
ReplyDeleteITEF fallen in the evil designs of ITGOA in NRP issue. Because of a few DR ITI who are going to benefit in their long cherished dream to become Additional CIT, the ITEF is in a bigger divided house due to vast members who are ICT, IM, Sports quota and C.A are going to affect and ITEF's unity in is question in the days to come as a huge litigation is going to start once revised seniority list is published. A large group of people are going to resign from ITEF in the days to come due to NRP issue.
ReplyDeleteHa...ha....
ReplyDeleteApni bhale ek aankh fut jaye...par dusare ka dono aankkh futna chahiye....
kya soch hai.....
How is implementation of a Supreme Court's order embarrassing to JCA? Can implementation of the order be avoided in any way?
ReplyDeleteIt is the Board and CCsIT CCAs who should be held accountable for not maintaining seniority of employees according to DoPT's instruction. The decision in NR Parmar case is nothing but a reminder to the authorities that the seniority list of employees is not according to their whims and fancy but according to a well defined rule.
Who maintains the seniority list of employees? JCA/ITGOA/ITEF of the office of CCsIT. Why was there deviation from the DoP's instruction in the first place? These are the questions to be raised.
JCA is sleeping in Tamilnadu. No promotion orders have been made in the cadre of TA STA OS ITI ITO etc for past 3 months. Who will bear the monetary loss to those people.? Wake up General Secretaries of ITEF and ITGOA.
ReplyDeletewhy you people are talking about reversions. knowing-fully, the fact that the implementation of apex court judgement is inevitable, it is made delayed till date (a minimum of one year), thus, caused fear of reversions, litigations and all. Indirectly We are digging our own ditch. Instead of making it further mess, let us try to find for useful solutions at this juncture. Thank you comrades.
ReplyDeleteCBDT is right.Things should be done as per law.we must agitate and fight for our rights but we should also see that nation should not suffer as we are already getting good salary from the government. This is the only organisation in the entire government set up where a peon can become IRS I. e. A class 1 officer.No other organisations can permit such huge promotions.An illeterate person also retires from gazetted rank in our department. What else we need? We should concentrate on work.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRight, few fradulent persons are unhappy due to promotions of other because they couldnot pass dept. Exam
DeleteWhat mr.Arumugam commented is agreeable. JCA jindhabad.
ReplyDeleteIRS people will be happy if there is misunderstanding between ITEF an ITGOA. Comrades please don't give room for that. Fight together to achieve our goal, which is common cause. Thanks. ITEF jindhabad. JCA jindhabad. ITGOA jindhabad.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely it is fine to fight together but all should be defined black n white that what will for itgoa and what will be for itef
DeleteFinally revised seniority list as per NRP is published in Mumbai Region. Its a big list containing more than 100 pages.But there is no transparency regarding how the NRP is implemented. No access to list for everyone. only one list is on the notice board, that too in the head office. list is still not in a public domain i.e. not on internet which indicates that admn is fearing of more litigation. Two weeks time given for raising the objection. it is needless to say that litigation are bound to happen. Promotion of Insp. to ITO and ITO to ACIT is remote possibility in near future.
ReplyDeleteAll the problem in the Department is due to single issue of CADRE RESTRUCTURE. Had it not been implemented, all the Officers and Staff could have done their regular work. For the past 2 years no fruitful work has been done/carried out by any body in the department. Daily the discussion going on DR IRS Vs Promotee IRS, DR Vs PR issue. implementation of NRP etc., only going on. Its better time to scrap the entire CR and revert all the promoted on account of CR and asked to do previous work what ever they did previously. Some body has to bring this to the knowledge of our PM.
ReplyDeleteAll promotee itis and ITOs are requested not to participate in the JCA call for agitation till the decision of honourable supreme Court I rajeev mohan is implemented uniformingly.
ReplyDeleteDR itis and their selfish counterparts that is Promotee acit and DCIT want to use the promotees ITOs and itis as cotraceptives to further their non existent careers and unachievable ambition to become add cit or cit (promotee)
Rajiv mohan is for seniority between direct inspectors only so comrades dont get confused. Propagandist want to divide JCA.
ReplyDeleteJCA or CBDT cannot defy supreme court judgment. These people blaming JCA for impossible thing. If they can get decision from supreme court or amendment in constitution from modi govt, then they can blame JCA. But they are propagandist , they dont know law, they can criticize, they cannot do anything positive.
Long live jca.
Natural justice of seniority eak honi chahiye as per Rajiv Mohan latest decision direct banam direct me seniority date of joining hai to direct VS promotive me seniority date of joining se
Deletekyo nahi honi chhahiye
Mr 7,15 PM you are most appropriate person to go and tell the PM that we do not need CR
ReplyDeleteThankless person
Rather to be thankful to ITEF people trying to create disunity in the fedration
@ October 19, 2015 at 11:11 AM
ReplyDeletebecause, promotees can make artificial delay in joining of new recruits. so it is very logical to give seniority from the year in which vacancy arose. Department has not accepted that seniority would be given from the advertisement. but seniority would be give from date of vacancy arose or date of advertisement which is later. If department dont fill vacancies in time why should direct Inspector/UDC suffer? Now IRS lobby is delaying promotion of ITOs and make direct IRS senior. Promotee ACIT should also demand that they should be given seniority from the year in which vacancy arose irrespective of date of joining.
very foolish answer of @ October 19, 2015 at 11:11 AM.
ReplyDeletefirst of all try to know how the recruitment in IT dept. is going on ,Joining of new recruits is not in hands of promotes. Your date of birth is your parent's marriage date or your actual birth date?. Don't says that due to your parent's marriage u r in this world so your date of birth should be your's parent's marriage date.
Marriage expert, law is not governed by your marriage example. Imagine department doesnot conduct DPC for 3 year. On the other hand department recruit direct IRS for these 3 years. As per your stupid marriage example all the direct recruited IRS will be senior from promotees of 3 years if date of joining is base for seniority. What is fault of promotee officer. Law compensate loss due to administrative delay. You are crying because your purpose is not served. Go anywhere, cry aloud you can not suceed in you malicious purpose
DeleteHow can langoor compare or equate himself to a lion (direct irs)?
DeleteN R PARMAR GALAT DECISION HAI.
ReplyDeleteYes u are right Rajiv Mohan ne NR parmar KO kharij kardiya hai
ReplyDeleteWhy catch up rule not follow ? Revise seniority according catch up rule.....
ReplyDeleteDRs should be given seniority from the date of engagement of their parents.
ReplyDeleteN R PARMAR DECISION IS RIGHT BECAUSE IT TREAT INSPECTORS, UDC, LDC, PEON EQUALLY
ReplyDeleteBull shit promotee itis have got demoted. Where is the equality.
Deleteits shameful that we are fighting together without any reasonable cause decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court only based on the Dopts OM issued in 1986 and if the authorities had not maintained seniority list accordingly they must revise it. only crying that someone who came in the department after you only because of administrative delay why suffered. think about it and behave like a gentlemen and don't argue without logic.
ReplyDeleteCorrect
ReplyDeleteHere some DR IRS and their m.c. agents are also active with a single point agenda of spoiling the unity of JCA. So be aware of such creeps.
ReplyDeleteMr. Blogger if you can't control the subject, it's better to delete the blog. Otherwise it will weaken the JCA/ITEF//ITGOA to such an extent that each &every employee of the Department will have to suffer due to dictatorship of IRS people.
ReplyDeleteLet the truth prevail. N R PARMAR decision should be scrapped ad rajeev mohan and catch up rule should be implemented immediately.
DeleteI absolutely agree with you but it's not proper platform, you should represent first to Admn. If not satisfied, pursue the matter at the level of ITEF and CAT.
DeleteMere making repugnant comments here will not serve the purpose.
DeleteThere is a difference of opinion even among members of ITEF. Direct UDCs and TAs alongwith Inspectors have got benefit whereas LDC, steno and promotee TAs have to suffer loss.
DeleteIn NWR some TAs who joined in 2012 are going to get two promotions of Sr.TA and Inspector simultaneously only due to NR Parmar implementation. So there is huge difference of opinion regarding NR Parmar.
DeleteRajeev Mohan judgement will be implemented from the date of judgement.
ReplyDeleteNRP will be scrapped by cbdt
DeleteNRP CAN NEVER BE IMPLEMENTED
ReplyDeleteOnly due to ITEF & ITGOA, we people are surviving a dignified service life. Otherwise these m.c. DR IRS would have made our life miserable.
ReplyDeleteRevenue Secretary not happy with the way Income tax Department is functioning now and intervened to put up the files relating to Cadre Restructure and issue of Ito to ACIT promotion. Hope some solution will arise in near future.
ReplyDeleteN R P HATAOO DEPARTMENT BACHAO
ReplyDeleteNRP hatane walo, 7th pay commission me retirement service 33 years hone par tum khud hi hat jaoge. Jaldi bhago CAT me varna ITO me hi retire ho jaoge
ReplyDeleteAur Dr iti, ACIT ( woh bhi promotee) ke liye bheek mangte rahenge har saal
DeleteBechare itgoats.
ReplyDeleteWonderful article....You can also visit Tamil News to get latest news!!!
The doctrine of precedents does not apply to an order rejecting a Special Leave Petition. Where however the Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petition with reasons, this reason would attract Article 141 and be binding on all Courts in India. But a dismissal of a Writ Petition in limini without giving reasons therefor, would not operate as resjudicata, and such a decision does not amount to a declaration of the law within the meaning of Article 141, and it cannot bind a subordinate court. This was the view taken by Karantaka High Court in Govindnaik g. Kalaghatgi Vs. West Patent Press (AIR 1980 Kant. 130).
ReplyDeleteIn [Babu Parasu Kaikadi Vs. Babu (2004) 1 SCC 81], it was held that the Supreme Court is bound to follow the earlier judgment which is precisely on the point in preference to the later judgment which was rendered without adequate argument at the Bar and also without reference to the mandatory provisions of the enactment/precedents.
Decision in the case of Rajeev Mohan
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
S.L.P.(C) Nos. 17306-17307 of 2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on judgment
of this Court in Union of India and others versus
-2-
N.R. Parmar and others in support of his submission that the
respondent will rank senior simply because he has been transferred
from Bombay Circle to Kanpur Circle on his own request. The
respondent relies, in particular, on the observations made in
paragraph 7 of the judgment.
We have examined the entire fact situation in the
present case. We are satisfied that the impugned order passed by the
High Court does not require any interference.
The special leave petitions are, accordingly,
dismissed.
RAJEEV MOHAN LAAOO I.T. DEPARTMENT BACHAO
DeleteNAHI THO PARMAR KE GHULAM BAN JAOO
CBDT completely confused on NRP. Chairman and Members of the Board should be from IAS cadre. IAS can handle issue effectively due to having long period of experience of handling administrative matters.
ReplyDelete- Akhilesh Srivastava
Lucknow
NR parmar ki vakalat karne wale hamare bhai char department ka pani pine ke 4 sal bad income tax department ki yad aa jati hai to kya 3 sal pale Jo is department kO join kar chuka hai vah junior ho ga kya yahi aap log batana aur lagu karwana chate hai kya yah nyaysangat hai.bina es department me aaye unke umar ki garna kaise ho sakti hai?
ReplyDeleteलिखना तो सीख ले बुडबक
DeleteAkhilesh bhai, CBDT has not confused the NRP issue. CBDT originally was clearly given instructions on NRP based on the FAQ. Only ITEF at the behest of ITGOA confused the whole issue of NRP and the result we are facing now in the department. CBDT should not have yielded to the pressure of ITEF and ITGOA.
ReplyDeleteSamajhdar Bai, kaua apne ko bahut buddhiman samajhta hai phir bhi guh khata hai
ReplyDeleteIf any IAS had been posted in HRD, this much confusion had not been created on NRP issue.
ReplyDeleteIf IAS us posted in the HRD then promotee acit or promotee DCIT will have to work as LDC under the IAS.
ReplyDeleteIts better to work as LDC under IAS than as Group D inder IRS.
Delete