Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Pr CCIT Delhi issued Adhoc ITO promotion order

For the last few days, after the adhoc ACIT promotion, we have been flooded with queries regarding adhoc ITO promotion. Viewers were anxious to know whether adhoc promotion will be granted for the consequential adhoc vacancies in the ITO cadre.
Pr CCIT, Delhi stood first to grant adhoc promotion to the post of ITO today. As many as 12 Inspectors have been promoted to ITO on adhoc basis.
It may be expected that other regions will come out with similar promotion order at the earliest.
Click her to view the promotion order to the post of ITO in Delhi region.

76 comments:

  1. WB, Mumbai, temilnadu where bulk of the adhoc ACIT are promoted why ITO promotion not issued? What local ITEF doing in this regard?

    ReplyDelete
  2. ITEF is simply enjoying deep sleep with increased member subscriptions.I humbly request the national and regional leaders not to wake up!

    ReplyDelete
  3. KYA REGULAR PROMOTION BHE KABHI HOA GA ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. ITEF leaders of NWR region are interested in Transfer & Postings only, as they are the dealers of authorities. They have nothing to do with promotions, reason best known to them. They are spineless and don't have courage to pressurise the authorities. What to say about adhoc promotions, even regular promotions are distant dream.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why there is a long silence after adhoc 2014-15 ACIT promotions. When they are going to be regularized and also 2015-16 AC promotions? Itgoa sleeping after getting great adhoc promotions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ye duniya sab janti h re babu

    ReplyDelete
  7. Delhi region has considered consequential vacancy against promotion of ITO to ACIT for RAUV (recommended against unreserved vacancy) as general vacancy and RARV (Recommended against reserved vacancy) as reserved vacancy.
    As per this formula Mumbai has 20 RAUV means general vacancy, 2 general vacancy and 2 reserved vacancy.
    Total consequential vacancy in Mumbai-
    General -22
    Reserved - 2
    Some people in mumbai are propagating that all RAUV vacancies will be considered as reserved consequential vacancy but after this promotion order of Delhi region, it is clear that RAUV promotion will arise general consequential vacancy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What is ITEF doing in Odisha ? The adviser of ITEF and ex-General Secretary of Odisha Circle is suffering from the review DPC. Why adhoc ITO DPC for 4(one for reserve) is pending?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Can anybody tell the no. of probable candidates from West Bengal in the next DPC (2015-16) in the Adhoc ACIT promotion ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Can anybody tell the no. of probable candidates from West Bengal in the next DPC (2015-16) in the Adhoc ACIT promotion ?

    ReplyDelete
  11. It is not material whether an ITO has been promoted RAUV or RARV for promotion to the post of ITO. IT will be seen that ITOS who are promoted as ACIT were promoted as Reserved or On UR point in the promotion of ITO

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tamilnadu jca still in deep sleep and they are not doing any steps for ito promotion.

    ReplyDelete
  13. There is no reservation in ITO to ACIT promotion, therefore, for RAUV promotion, consequential vacancy will go to general category. RAUV and RARV is only for determining the category of consequential vacancy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pls update your knowledge..Reservation is there in ito to AC and not after that

      Delete
  14. 2006 batch tax assistant promoted as ito sr no 9-12

    ReplyDelete
  15. Out of 181 ITO promoted to ACIT,
    RAUV is 61
    RARV is 38
    It can never happen that 99 consequential vacancy out of 181 can be for reserved category.
    RAUV consequential vacancy is for general

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mr. 3.13 PM
    if RAUV, RARV is immetrial, why is the use of this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It means a rauv acit vacancy will go to UR when vacated and RARV acit vacancy will go ti reserved category when vacated in acit cadre.

      Delete
    2. But there is no reservation in ACIT cadre

      Delete
  17. AP & T Circle JCA is nothing much difference.

    ReplyDelete
  18. is there any chance for cgle 2011 ta for promotion to iti in recent b&c group dpc?

    ReplyDelete
  19. In Mumbai stay on the promotions of ITO is extended by CAT till 20.04.2015

    ReplyDelete
  20. Are any reservation in promotion for disabled employee as sc/st group A & B post

    ReplyDelete
  21. There is no HULCHAL in Rajasthan region. Administration and ITEF union members are sleeping in AC rooms and saying "work is going on".

    ReplyDelete
  22. Whether during adhoc promotion, candidates are picked as per seniority list irrespective of status (general/sc/st) of candidate

    ReplyDelete
  23. As vacancy based promotion roster used now, SC ST vacancies arises in ITOs on ACITs promotion will be considered only by SC ST candidates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Percentage based reservation was beneficial that time, so you oped that
      Now vacancy based roster is beneficial so you like this
      You should be happy
      General is ready to sacrifice for Manusmariti

      Delete
    2. We don't want to be a SC ST candidates for taking away from General candidates' promotion. we may appeal to Government.

      Delete
    3. Whether govt accept or not regardin your wish
      But u can decide whether your child should grab quota of needy sc./st people or not

      Delete
    4. We never wants promotion by reservation policy as well as our children. Don't worry it happens and sleep well

      Delete
    5. It doesnt happen until and unless someone demands
      Nobody force anyone not to fill category as general

      Delete
    6. Children of govt servant cant be deprived by any means and dont require reservation at the cost of poor reserved category

      Delete
  24. In tamilnadu also no news about ITO promotion orders and when it will come. our great general secretary is in firing mood if any body ask about ITO promotion.

    ReplyDelete
  25. is there any chance for cgle 2011 ta for promotion to iti in recent b&c group dpc?

    ReplyDelete
  26. please tell when the DPC of ito will be conducted in NWR

    ReplyDelete
  27. Today AP & T administration issued 14 ITO promotions i.e. on 7-4-2016. Had the CBDT issued ACIT promotions before 31-3-2016, I would have got promotion as ITO. Please let me know whether the ITIs who qualified for ITO exam during November 2015 are eligible for consequential promotion as ITO against the 2014-15 DPC ITO to ACIT promotions issued by the Board on 7-4-2016

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No they are not eligible. Only those members are eligible for 2014.15 who are qualified as on Ist Jan 2014. In 2015.16, peraons are eligible who were declared qualified ito exam as on 1.4.15 and for further years so on.

      Delete
    2. If there are no candidate available in v.y. 21014-15,vacancies Will be carried forward to 2015-16 and so on

      Delete
    3. Since promotion order released on 7 april 16 consewuential vacancies will be of 2016-17 irrespective of the fact that dpc for acit was for 2014_15 and so persons who qualified ito exam in 2015 will be eligible for ad hoc promotion

      Delete
  28. Ito dpc in nwr coducted wait for out of order

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is to be wait for dpc out of order or we have to wait for orders to out.

      Delete
  29. Tamilnadu ITO promotion order is quite suspence as no body is giving any news including federation people. Other states are issuing promotion order one by one whereas in Tamil nadu due to hot summer, it seems that all gone to Ooty and kodaikanal.

    ReplyDelete
  30. From the feedback of most of the bloggers, it is seen that the itef office bearers are turning slowly into arrogance and not answering member's doubts and clarifications.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mumbai me 6 Inspectors (Shishir Kumar Pandey, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Surendra Kumar, Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Kaushlendra Kumar and Shreenandan Sahay) ne CAT se any promotion order par stay laga diya hai. Ab na to MTS, Notice Server, TA, Sr. TA, ITI or na hi ITO ka promotion ho sakta hai till the stay. ITO to ACIT ka chain vacancy ka effect nahi diya ja sakta hai till the stay. ITEF aur ITOGOA tamasha dekh rahi hai. All India me Mumbai Zone piche ja rahi hai. Ye 6 ITIs ne sare logon ka promotion rok rakha hai. CAT me Walia advocate ne sab manage kar rakha hai.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone has right to approach court if administration takes decision arbitrarily or in influence of a specific lobby. In Shishir Pandey case it seems that mumbai admin was waiting that if someone bring stay on promotion,
      Mumbai admin is worst in carrier prospects of its employees

      Delete
    2. Commenting anonymously while giving name of d applicants is not fair dear. Fighting for ones right is not sin, come what may.

      Delete
    3. Shishir pandey is fighting for justice
      Best of luck
      God bless you

      Delete
  32. Wait for out of order

    ReplyDelete
  33. Union leaders have achieved a lot such as laptop to iti, cellphone, 50 liters petrol to iti, scd conversion etc. Thats why they became arrogant.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yes, everyone has right to approach court, but stay is not justified because it can hamper the carrier prospects of our colleagues.

    ReplyDelete
  35. ITGOA leadership is having double standards. First they demanded implementation on nrp. But now they don't want to implement in all the states because of refixation of seniority will adversely impact their important zonal leaders which resulted in complete chaos in the department. This is the right time to dismantle the itgoa.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Mumbai 6 ITIs who stayed the all promotions, are requested to fight for your right but do not continue stay on promotion otherwise it may be chances to loose your case. Don't increase the number of opposition. That may be harmful to your case. Situation in Mumbai promotion is critical and ITEF and ITGOA is enjoying it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. judiciary has itself given a stay considering the seriousness of the issue moreover it is a slap on Mumbai Admn. for what hell they have done in review DPC.Now judiciary will take its course of action.It is wrong to held responsible these ITO's for stay.No one can direct CAT to give stay or not to give stay.

      Delete
    2. Do not threaten.

      Delete
    3. U should have questioned the Mumbai Admn They have made mockery of the NRP judgement.

      Delete
  37. After getting adhoc 2014-15 ACIT promotions, there is a long silence over the status of referring it to DoLA etc.,

    ReplyDelete
  38. April 17, 2016 at 9:39 PM are you fool? Before putting any comments, you study the rules first and post. Now there is a concept of vacancy year. So the consequential promotions will also given to the respective vacancy year eligible candidates only. Dont mislead.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Shishir pande & company
    Your fight is with direct LDC, so dont increase your opponents and request to CAT to lift stay otherwise stay will definitely be vacated and you will lose your base case too

    ReplyDelete
  40. April 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM
    Pr. CAT has given decision in this aspect and DOPT also directed CBDT to consider the consequential vacancies in the year when the actually arose i.e. 2016-17

    ReplyDelete
  41. ITO promotion on account of consequential vacancies still not issued in Tamil Nadu.

    ReplyDelete
  42. dpc 2016-17 when?

    ReplyDelete
  43. ITO promotion on account of consequential vacancies still not issued in Tamil Nadu.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The dept is moving nowhere..No promotions only litigations...Kabhi CAT, kabhi HC, sab pakda pakdi khel rahe hai..ab DR 2008 batch ko jo 2006 mila hai ab unko 2002 chahiye..Sab ke sab paagal ho gaye hai, Ek RAHUL WALIA Intelligent hai jo Parasite ki tarah sabka khoon choos raha hai..Friends vakil ki asliyat samjho...Good luck all..

    ReplyDelete
  45. In Nwr ta and se.ta also going to cat against steno quota in the promotion of iti

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plz give details regarding the same.

      Delete
  46. Earlier 2008 DR SSPrasad and Co. Stayed the promotions for two years from 2012 to 2014, now 1996 DR UDC S Pande has stayed the promotion...Sabko khelne do. Saare promotee DR Insp ho yaa DR UDC sab ITO mein hi retire ho jaenge..IRS brains zindabad..they are happy ,let the fight go on.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Rahul Walia Advocate is the only beneficiary..it seems he is charging big amounts..pls inform, we at Jaipur IT also want to contact him..His Mob no. Please

    ReplyDelete
  48. It seems local advocates get favourable orders from CAT due to ...They charge hefty fees for such orders between one to two Lacs per person. If u contest properly, these orders most probably will not survive. Advocates also know this. Now agreived person should file vigilance petition wherefrom such huge amounts are being paid.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Shishir Pande & CO, if you are interested in court cases, then you should file petitions against Betterment, Catch up rule so that everyone support you and get benefits. By filing petition against correct seniority list, you are spoiling your as well as others career. Think positively and get well soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct seniority list??????
      Then why you kept silence on wrong seniority list for ten years???? 2006 to 2016 Hai koi Jawab?

      Delete
  50. Mr. Shishir paney & company
    Take care of consequential vacancies in mumbai region from ito to acit promotion (2014-15). There are only two conse. vacancies for reserved category (RARV). All 21 RAUV vacencies are for general candidates as these ito were adjusted against general vacancies in 2001. Few elements in admin are trying hard to consider these vacencies as reserved vacencies. If you dont take care of general vacancies, you be will be delayed by 3 years

    ReplyDelete
  51. why Itef is not pressurizing Pccit for promotion of TA to STA???

    why New RR for EA are not published n when We can hope new RR for EA??

    Why new inter charge transfer policies are not framed??

    If any ITEF member is here plz clarify our doubts.

    Thnks and Regards

    ReplyDelete