CBDT clarifies that if an unprocessed return is selected for scrutiny assessment and notice under section 143(2) issued, such return should not be processed u/s 143(1).
This clarification certainly removes the ambiguity of expression under section 143(1D).
Click here for the clarification
This clarification certainly removes the ambiguity of expression under section 143(1D).
Click here for the clarification
2 comments:
THESE SUPERVISORY OFFICERS ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN OUTSOURCING AND POINT TO GFR/FRSR ETC. WHEN ADVISED ALTERNATIVE MEANS. BUT THEY USE THESE OFFICIAL CARS FOR THEIR HOUSE PICKUP/DROPPING INSPITE OF DRAWING TA OR FOR THEIR OTHER PERSONAL USE. THEY CONVENIENTLY IGNORE GFR/FRSR IN THESE CONTEXT. CONVENIENTLY THEY FOLLOW RULES AND IGNORE RULES. WHO WILL ASK THEM / CONTROL THESE. WILL THE BJP GOVT. CONTROL THESE.
Provision added in the Act in 2012, instruction is too much late
Post a Comment