Friday, May 31, 2013

Ministry of Finance issued cadre restructuring notification for Income Tax Dept.

In consequence to the cadre review approved by the cabinet earlier this month, MOF has come out with much awaited notification today.
It is stated that in the cadre of ACIT, 166 regular pots + 620 reserve posts + 563 vacancies (consequential due to promotion in higher grade) to be filled up in a span of five years.
All other posts which are to be filled up by promotion to be filled at once without waiting for the recruitment rule amendment. Therefore it is time for cheers for the departmental employees as promotion in a very large scale is going to happen soon.
The notification available in irsofficersonline.gov.in but as it is limited to IRS officers right now, the notification is linked below for everyone.
View the notification

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Will all the posts of inspector be filled by promotion only

Shyamali Basu said...

The notification has some silly mistakes. In the annex A , Sr No. 12 the Grade pay of A.O. Gr III should be 4600 instead of 4200. In Sr No. 21, Grade Pay of DPA Gr B also to be replaced with 4600.

Anonymous said...

the much awaited cadre restructuring had at last come. Will it benefit the Group-C and Group-B employees. I believe that "not it will not happen". Because please refer to Para 2.ii of F.no.A-11013/1/2013-Ad.VII, dated 31/3/2013, of CBDT, which says that the Cabinet has permitted to fill up the additional vacancies as per Model RR of DOPT. Please see the model RR No. AB.14017/61/2008-Estt. (RR), dated 24/3/2010, issued by the DOPT. Without seeing the consequence by without reading the model RR of the DOPT, you people are fighting each other being Stenographers and Ministerial Staff. This fighting has rightly benefitted the people like you to lost everything, because Notes in the said Model RR clearly states that the merged cadres will not have any right to their in their erstwhile cadre, i.e. Stenographer Gr-I & II, O.S., & STA. I advise you to fight again and again without knowing that the sand under your feet has been washed away.

Anonymous said...

the FM already promised 70k crores revenue consequent to CR in this FY. Unless the DR ITI posts diverted to PR, how can this be achieved in 9 months time?

Anonymous said...

Would u plz explain some more clearly thanx !

Anonymous said...

can anybody clarify the sum and substance of 2nd para of notification..for what board has taken one time approval from Cabinet?

Anonymous said...

How does the above said merged cadre effect the promotion into the next cadre i.e. ITI? Pl. explain.

Anonymous said...

Please see the Para-V of No. AB.14017/61/2008-Estt. (RR) of DOPT, dated 31/3/2013.

(v) Regulation of regular rendered in the pre-revised scales
The revised pay structure approved includes a number of 'merged grades' with a
common grade pay and the concept of pay bands with grade pay introduced
effective from 1.1.2006. Insofar as the issue of regulation of service rendered prior
to 1.1.2006 is concerned, while the general rule may be that such regular service
be deemed to be service rendered in the corresponding grade pay / pay scale
approved effective from 1.1.2006 or from a subsequent date, as the case maybe,
this formulation cannot apply in cases where there has been merger of more than
one grade into one with a single grade pay/ pay scale. Since the merger is
effective from 1.1.2006 only, even notional benefits of the merger cannot be
extended for periods falling prior to 1.1.2006. A Note to the following effect may,
therefore, be inserted under col.12 of the Schedule on RRs, and under relevant
provisions in Service Rules, to take care of the requirements:
Note:
For the purpose of computing minimum qualifying service for promotion, the
service rendered on a regular basis by an officer prior to 1.1.2006 / the date from
which the revised pay structure based on the 6th CPC recommendations has been
extended, shall be deemed to be service rendered in the corresponding grade pay
/ pay scale extended based on the recommendations of the Commission. For
purposes of appointment on deputation / absorption basis, the service rendered on
a regular basis by an officer prior to 1.1.2006 / the date from which the revised pay
structure based on the 6th CPC recommendations has been extended, shall be
deemed to be service rendered in the corresponding grade pay / pay scale
extended based on the recommendations of the Commission except where there
has been merger of more than one pre-revised scale of pay into one grade with a
common grade pay / pay scale, and where this benefit will extend only for the
post(s) for which that grade pay / pay scale is the normal replacement grade
without any upgradation.

Anonymous said...

when is the allocation of charge wise additional post is expected?

Anonymous said...

will all the additional posts of ITI be filled in phased manner like that of IRS

Anonymous said...

ANONYMOUS SAID :-
Please elaborate the recruitment rule which will be considered while implementing cadre view specifically what will be the feeder cadre for the promotion of Inspector post, whether TA or Senior TA , for minimum length of service is 3 years or 4 years in the respective feeder cadre. Whether all post created for inspector will be filed at one stage on in two stages

Anonymous said...

I could not resist commenting. Exceptionally well written!

Anonymous said...

It is heard that ITEF has given proposal to the cadre restructuring committee that stenographer cadre should not be promoted to Inspector post in future and they will be promoted only to PS post. Has someone any idea on this issue.

Anonymous said...

I blog often and I genuinely thank you for your information. This article has truly peaked
my interest. I will bookmark your website and keep checking for new details about once per week.

I subscribed to your Feed as well.

Anonymous said...

Greetings! Very helpful advice in this particular article!
It's the little changes that produce the largest changes.
Many thanks for sharing!

It may kindly be noted that comments published in this blog are the views of our readers. The administrator of this blog is not responsible in any way regarding the comments and opinions expressed here.
Viewers are requested to post relevant comments only and abstain from making any comment which can hurt any person or group.

My Headlines