With mounting pressure from both within the organization and ITEF members, ITGOA compelled to take part in the proposed strike action and today served strike notice to CBDT.
The earlier stand of "extending solidarity support" has been strongly criticized in all forum as an escapist move. Click here to view discussion in this blog earlier.
"Keeping in view of our earlier participation and as opined by the majority units, a Strike notice has been served on the CBDT, New Delhi on 27-08-2015. A copy of the strike notice served on the Chairperson, CBDT, New Delhi is enclosed herewith for submission of the same to the respective Pr. CCIT’s. In view of this, we would like to appeal to all the Units to mobilize their members for participation in the one day Strike action on 02-09-2015 and to make it a grand success."
Click here to view ITGOA Circular dated 27.08.15 and copy of strike notice.
The earlier stand of "extending solidarity support" has been strongly criticized in all forum as an escapist move. Click here to view discussion in this blog earlier.
"Keeping in view of our earlier participation and as opined by the majority units, a Strike notice has been served on the CBDT, New Delhi on 27-08-2015. A copy of the strike notice served on the Chairperson, CBDT, New Delhi is enclosed herewith for submission of the same to the respective Pr. CCIT’s. In view of this, we would like to appeal to all the Units to mobilize their members for participation in the one day Strike action on 02-09-2015 and to make it a grand success."
Click here to view ITGOA Circular dated 27.08.15 and copy of strike notice.
38 comments:
Good sense prevails on them
Good news. Finally ITGOA have realised after 'consultation' with units that if they continue this attitude they will be alienated in the department. ITEF members throughout the country know how ITGOA members have participated in the 'walkouts' organised under the banner of JCA. ITEF members walkout while ITGOA members strive hard for country's welfare.Let them atleast from now on realise they cannot cheat ITEF members any more.
ITGOA IS FINISHED. ITGOA MEMBER'S CONSISTS MOSTLY OF DR ITIs TURNED ITOs WHO WANT TO BACK STAB PROMOTEE ITIs AND DENY THEM OF THEIR PROMOTIONS.
SO IN FUTURE ITEF MEMBERS CONSISTING OF GR C OFFICIALS SHOULD BOYCOTT ALL CALL GIVEN BY ITGOA FOR NON COPERATION OR WALK OUT OR STRIKE.
Phirbhi ITO SE ACIT KA promotion nahi hoga. Chalo Jantar Mantar par. Hai himate ITGOA KE pass.
rightly said!!
There had been instances of bad experience involving ITGOA in the name of JCA. The ITGOAns at field level should not find one or the other excuse for non co-op.Anyway, Good sign of co-op.I wish this trend to continue even after meeting the demand of bulk of ACIT promotions.
What about those 1633 posts likely to be diverted from West Bengal ? Those posts are neither in WB nor in any other region. Are they going to be abolished ? What about the committee which is formed regularly to look into this matter and become defunct silently ?
Committee sleeping like Bekaar and Dupak.
Recent decision of Supreme Court in respect of seniority in promotion of SC/ST. It will be more complicated to implemement. In this decision Apex Court has adjudicated that constitution provide reservation in promotion but not in seniority. It means if a general candidate and SC candidate join as TA from same exam and general candidate is above in Rank. SC candidate become inspector early due to Reservation and general candidate become inspector 4 years later. Now genearal candidate will be senior to that SC candidate again and for promotion to ITO he will be considered prior to that SC candidate.
Now this aspect should also be considered while making eligibility list as per NRP. If any general candidate find any junior SC/ST candidate of his batch above him in eligibility list, he can challenge it irrespective of length of service.
These 1633 posts are being diverted to Syrian and iraqi refugees and NR parmar is also being made applicable to them.
Not only same batch, the SC ST superseded some 5 to 6 batches of seniors. What a shame of the system? it is justified one SC ST on recruitment but giving reservation in promotion is very ver bad and at present time not required because sufficient SC ST employees in Group B and C service. There is no reservation in Group A service.
this is the link of supreme Court judgment which deny seniority due to reservation in promotion:
http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/FileServer/2015-08-28_1440762395.pdf
Agar kisi deptt me SC ST candidate nehin hai wahan GENERAL candidate ko temporality promotion diya ja sakta hai. wo supreme court ka latest judgement hai. to friends leg pulling karne ka subject change kardo.
It appears that despite of agitation program and strike notice CBDT is still in Kumbhakarni neend, .Now the time has come JCA should start agitation with one point charter of demand to have all the CBDT members and Chairman from IAS.
SINCE ITGOA OFFICE BEARERS ARE MOSTLY IN FAVOUR OF N R P TO FURTHER THEIR CAREER PROSPECTS ( DREAMING TO BECOMING CIT ) THERE IS NO POINT IN SUPPORTING THE STRIKE BY PROMOTEE ITOS AND WASTE TIME FOR THESE SELFISH CROOKS.
Itgoa & itef should write to DOPT to issue an OM as per decision of Supreme Court wrt reservation in promotion and implement 'catch up' rule in seniority.
Recent supreme Court decision on seniority of SC ST in promotion is now law of land. While fixing seniority RAJEEV MOHAN judgement should also be implemented
Delhi mai 15-16 ke ITI promotion ho chuke hai?
Mr. Partha Supreme court merely interpreted 1986 OM. And OM 86 protect deliberate delay in joining. If you joined as UDC/TA you will get benefit of this when your seniority is fixed with LDC. If you are LDC you will get benefit of it when seniority is fixed with Peon. You can not expect such benefit on each and every stage like SC/ST. If you joined service early after Passing exam or on compensation you got salery for that period on the other hand who waited for years after examination due to any reason without salery get some benefit in the form of seniority. You are giving example of youR marriage. Now tell what was the fault of that candidate who waited for such a long time after clearing exam.
After marrying you were enjoying and who has passed exam but he was unemployed. Who is more sufferer? At least you was enjoying after marriage and being son in law of govt
MY DEAR SUPPORTERS OF NRP, WHY IS IT NOT IMPLEMENTED OTHER DEPARTMENTS?
You can not take plea in any court that that person killed thousand person and walking free and I have killed a person so I should be allowed to walk free
It requires hard labour and courage to make change. It has been implementeted in Secretriat and NRP is nothing but interperation of DOPT's OM 1986. employees in other department are lazy or not aware of it like following joke:
एक राजा था जिसकी प्रजा हम भारतीयों की तरह सोई हुई थी !
बहुत से लोगों ने कोशिश की प्रजा जग जाए...
अगर कुछ गलत हो रहा है तो उसका विरोध करे,
लेकिन प्रजा को कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता था !
राजा ने तेल के दाम बढ़ा दिये, प्रजा चुप रही,
राजा ने अजीबो गरीब टैक्स लगाए, प्रजा चुप रही,
राजा मनमानी करता रहा लेकिन प्रजा चुप रही,
एक दिन राजा के दिमाग मे एक बात आई उसने एक अच्छे-चौड़े
रास्ते को खुदवा के एक पुल बनाया जबकि वहां पुल की कतई आवश्यकता नहीं थी...
प्रजा फिर भी चुप थी, किसी ने नहीं पूछा के भाई यहाँ तो किसी
पुल की जरुरत नहीं है, आप काहे बना रहे है..?
राजा ने अपने सैनिक उस पुल पे खड़े करवा दिए और पुल से गुजरने वाले हर व्यक्ति से टैक्स लिया जाने लगा,
फिर भी किसी
ने कोई विरोध नहीं किया !
फिर राजा ने अपने सैनिको को हुक्म दिया कि जो भी इस पुल से गुजरे उसको ""4 जूते"" मारे जाए और एक शिकायत पेटी भी पुल पर रखवा दी कि किसी को अगर कोई शिकायत हो तो शिकायत पेटी मे लिख कर डाल दे,
लेकिन प्रजा फिर भी चुप !
राजा रोज़ शिकायत पेटी खोल कर देखता की शायद किसी ने कोई विरोध किया हो, लेकिन उसे हमेशा पेटी खाली मिलती !
कुछ दिनो के बाद अचानक एक चिट्ठी मिली ..
राजा खुश हुआ के चलो कम से कम एक आदमी तो जागा....
जब चिट्ठी खोली गयी तो उसमे लिखा था -
"हुजूर जूते मारने वालों की संख्या बढ़ा दी जाए"...
हम लोगों को घर जाने मे देरी होती है !
ऐसे हो गए हैं हम ....
और हमारा समाज......
N R P cannot be implemented even in his own case leave aside implementation in the entire rank and file of the I.T. DEPT. Along with N R P supreme Court decision in Rajeev mohan and the latest decision of supreme Court in the case of tamilnadu engrs needs implementation.
Getting back date seniority thru back door corrupted means by obtaining advisory or instructions or notification shall not be helpful in long term.
Now multiple petition are being filed in various Courts and ITO to ACIT DPC may be delayed or ITOS may be promoted on ADHOC basis.
The decision of honourable supreme Court on the catch up rule has to be implemented along with the decision in the case of patanjali sharma in the I.T. DEPT non implementation will mean devisive approach by CBDT HRD DOPT
Looks to be adopted by NRP
list of ITOs issued,ready for ad-hoc promotions.... can anyone reply over delhi region related above query
Catch up rule is basically for state govt employees. Do not misinterpret it friends. No such thing has been given by supreme court
It is difficult to understand why the so called deprived promotees have not filed review petition before S,C, immediately after the judgement, it can be done now also instead of infighting they should think to file a petition before the S.C. to review its decision.
NRP entered in this deptt as LDC/UDC. Actually you belong to NRP school of thought who was unable to interpret DOPT OM 1986. NRP who won in Gujrat High Court and lost in Supreme Court. If you tell me when and on what rank you entered in this deptt. I would be able to how can you get benefit of OM 1986
If catch rule is implemented, no sc/st candidate is going to be promoted as ACIT
Catch up rule is based on constitution of india and 100 times more applicable in centre government than state government
MONEY POWER judgement
If N R P decision which was between PR DR OF Gujarat region is made applicable throughout the country then why not the supreme Court decision in the case of tamilnadu engrs.
Because they are dignified unlike bootleggers DRs
Absolutely it is for all india. Reservation in seniority is unconstitutional as said by Supreme Court. If had it been Congress Govt, surly some groups would have approached for constitutional amendmend but in Mody regime they will not think about it. No CAT can deny catch up rule.
My dear friend, before penning down any comment on a post, please use your +5 + glasses - You have forgotten to even read the first word " If " - Trying for you to understand the literal meaning is so much beyond your hazel nut that forget even trying to understand the underlying principal of my post !
My dear friend, First let me know when I also had to wait long enough after having cleared my exam to get my first salary, what was my fault then ? Justice should be met out to all according to the same parameters, irrespective of the cadre or class - isn't it, my friend - but sad to state that basically that is the difference among us - I hope U have got my point !
Post a Comment