"The Chairperson,
Central Board of Direct Taxes,
North Block, New Delhi- 110 001
Madam,
Sub: One Day Strike as per the call of Central Joint Council of Action (JCA) on 08-10-2015.
This is to give notice that all the members of Income Tax Gazetted officers’ Association (ITGOA) and Income Tax Employees’ Federation (ITEF) will go on one day’s strike on 08th October, 2015. The Charter of Demands in pursuance of which the JCA has decided to go on strike in given below."
Click here to read more
Central Board of Direct Taxes,
North Block, New Delhi- 110 001
Madam,
Sub: One Day Strike as per the call of Central Joint Council of Action (JCA) on 08-10-2015.
This is to give notice that all the members of Income Tax Gazetted officers’ Association (ITGOA) and Income Tax Employees’ Federation (ITEF) will go on one day’s strike on 08th October, 2015. The Charter of Demands in pursuance of which the JCA has decided to go on strike in given below."
Click here to read more
51 comments:
aar-par ki karo tabi kuch hoga. indifinete strik se hi hoga. same pain more gain
Nobody cares go to strike or go to hell they have no effect
Chale Jantar Mantar . Call Anna Hazare
ITEF should dis-associates from this strike.
Stop the search and survey action not submit reports
non cooperation should include no participation in Search and Survey.
ITGOA ke agitation me to itef sath ho jata hai but itef ke agitation me itgoa nhi aata.
Kyun itef, itgoa ka with de rha hai?
Rightly said, stop participating in survey and search. dont send any report.
Agar hum ek mahina bhi strike Karenge to bhi koyee care nahi karega. Agar survey search band Karenge to kuch asar hoga. Agar aaj se leke budget task report stop Karenge to bahut asar hoga.
Koi fayda nai jab apne hi dushman bane ho to board se kya sikayat, ernaculam CAT ne phir seITO to ACIT promotion par stay diya.. Ab strike Dr kya fayda
Now no DPC FOR ACIT FROM ITO I F.Y 2015 16. DPC POSSIBLE ONLY IN 16 17 after implementation of N R PARMAR; RAJEEV MOHAN AS WELL AS CATCH UP RULE.
Catch up rule implementation will fetch about 50 seats out of 180 for deprived general candidate
even after 3 years NRP could not be implemented,it will take further 5 years in implementation of Rajeev Mohan and catchup rule till than another court decision will come this is unending this means no promotions for group B AND Group C and all will retire in the Entry cadre itself.
Very good sir honourable supreme Court decision has to be implemented by CBDT. No discrimination as all are equal before law.
Yes so very nice. what will happen to DR ITIs ambition of retiring as CIT ? POOR SOULS
Isska zimmedhar kewal ITEF hai.
DR iti 2005 has become ITO and after 8 years they will become acit because till then nrp and catch up would have been implemented. Remember this batch forced cbdt to initiate nrp implementation. We know how to fight for our right. You dont
Sara problem catch up implement nahi hone ke karan hai
May their souls rest in peace along with the soul of N R parmar
NR Parmar to retire ho gaya par jo itne bhasmsur aur Raktbeej paida ho gaye hain inka kya kare
Gujjus are threatening to file contempt if DPC will be held before implementation of NRP. Some of them are dreaming to become CIT on the shoulder of NRP. but they should remember that the other petitions will also be filed for implementation of Rajeev Mohan and Catch up rule, and no body will get promotions, Hame nahi to tumhe nahi chain nahi aaram nahi.
I again call all the promotees to file petitions before Honable Supreme Court to review its decision in NRP, at least the S.C. may be requested to give directions for implementation of the decision from the date of order. If agree please give support with your Mobile No.
NRP, RAJEEV MOHAN, CATCH UP RULE SIRF ITHNA HAI AUR ABI AUR KYA KYA AANE WANA HAI.?
There is no conflict between nrp and rajiv mohan
Therefore both can be implemented side by side
But catch up is important
ALL SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS CARRY EQUAL WEIGHTAGE SO ALSO CATCH UP RULE AND RAJEEV MOHAN JUDGEMENT SHOULD ALSO BE IMPLEMENTED TO ENSURE EQUITABLE JUSTICE AND FAITH IN DEMOCRACY.
CBDT HRD DOPT SHOULD NOT ALLOW THEM TO BE BRANDED "ADOPTED SONS OF NRP"
We have to write to the DoPT highlighting the violation of its instruction by the CBDT for revisiting the undisputed and settled seniority cases prior to SC judgment in NRP.
The Gujarat Hihg court in the case of NR permar held that Direct recruitee gets his seniority from the date of joining. On this basis, the Allahabad High court in ther case of Rajiv Mohan an inter charge transferee joined at Kanpur from Goa held that Rajiv Mohan is senior to that of Arvind kumar Trivedi a Direct Recruit inspector who joined after Rajiv mohan in Kanpur.
Not agree with the said ruling, Arvind kumar trivedi filed SLP against Rajiv mohan.
In the mean while, the Union of India filed SLP against NR permar especially about the clarification of 3.3.2008 OM. The Supreme court held that 3.7.86 OM is over riding effect on 3.3.2008 OM and more this 3.3.2008 OM is clarificatory in nature and not in ammendment held ab-initio on 27-11-2012.
After one year in 2013, the Supreme court has dismissed the petition filed by Arvind kumar trivedi a Direct recruit inspector of Kanpur charge and upheld the order of the Allahabad High court and ruled that Rajiv mohan is senior to Arvind kumar trivedi becuase he joined earlier to the DR. what is it mean. It meant the Direct recurit and inter charge also gets their seniority from the day they have joined .
Since, this Supreme court ruling has come after NR permar decission and by the time of revisiting seniority, the CCIT has to consider this ruling also.
Next the ADRP vacancies of 2002-03 to 2005-06 with a combination of additional manpower created in the department have given requisition to SSC at a stretch in February 2007 and by that time, the SSC selection process has been stopped much earlier to this. Even SSC has warned the CBDT and HRD to give seloect list from the stopped recruitment process of 2005 notification that it may leads to legal complication but our CBDT and HRD has not worried about this and given appopintment to the reserve lists.
Defintely it is a wrong policy adopted by the department by not providing equality of opportunity to those who have completed graduation in the year 2006 and 2007 as they have lost opportrunity to appear for exam.
Next with regard to seniority, these vacancies will falls in CARRY FOR4WARD VACANCIES ( Because the ADRP vacancies pertains to 2002-03 to 2005-06 ie 4 years how it can be held as pertains to one year ie 2005. definitely not. Next with regard to additional manpower created in december 2006 and February 2007 for this no examination was conducted as held in NR permar.
1000% guarantee that the appointees of inspoectors who came from 2005 notification joined in 2008 never gets seniority retrospective and at the most they have to put enblock below all the promotee of 2008 . Why becuase they have been called as filling up of future vacancies from the previous selection process..
With regard to rider it may increase or decrease in the notification - it means that inter chargee, surplus, compassionate and sports quoita will normally occupy the DR quota and these can be filled up before the DRs have joined in the department and to the extent available vacancies of DRs, the rider says that it may increase or decrease.. The foremost thumb rule is No recruting agency could appoint beyond advertised vacancies that what the supreme court has ruled in 100 number of cases.
From reliable information, it is reveals that some people not belongs to OUR DEPTT are mis leading the readers of this blog. Most of the readers and commentator comments misleading information to confuse the employees of the INCOME TAX DEPTT. some of the people are CENTRAL EXCISE, ED and others deptt. They are doing this out of jealousy. They can not bear the promotion and career prospectus of our department. So be careful about the irrelevant comments of other deptt. Please don't pay attention RAJIV MOHAN JUDGEMENT AND RENU KUMARI. None of IT Deptt employee writes this comment. Both decision was only for that case and not for all. Hence, don't be mislead by other departmental employee. Thanks.
ernaculam CAT ne phir se ITO to ACIT promotion par stay diya ? Kya yar khabar sahi hai. I don't think so. No one is confirming. If yes, please post its order No. or order for confirmation.
please do not pay attention on misleading comments. They are joker. Sirf maja lete hai dusron ko hurt karke. All are requested post only such comments which is the subject matter mentioned above. Bhonke se kuch nahi milta. Mihnat karo aur positive soch rakho.
Rajiv Mohan Was a ICT, then how hi will get seniority over the Dr Recruitee for that particular vacancy year. Read the OMs of 1986, which conveys that ICR, compassionate will be placed below both Dr and Pr joined in the same vacancy year. Mr 7.59 pm why you mislead the reader of this blog. You have no rationale in your comments. Just wait and watch, Only can NRP will be implemented.
NRP WILL ONLY SERVE THE ALL PURPOSE SO WAIT FRIENDS JUSTICE DEFINITELY REVEALS.
good suggestion by Mr.September 12, 2015 @05.31pm.
NRP DECISION WAS MEANT FOR DISPUTE OF SENIORITY BETWEEN VIRENDRA GUPRA AND PARMAR IF GUJARAT THEN HOW THE DECISION WAS APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE DRs of I.T. DEPT AS WELL AS OTHER DEPT.
SIMILARLY RAJEEV MOHAN AND RENU KUMARI AND CATCH UP RULE SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ONE AND ALL. NO DISCRIMINATION AND DISTINCTION. DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES AND ETHICS SHOULD BE MAINTAINED. CBDT DOPT AND HRD OFFICIALS SHOULD NOT BECOME SLAVES OF DR ITIs ESPECIALLY THOSE UNCONSTITUTIONAL DR ITIs RECRUITS OF 2008 09 THAT GOT BACK DATED SENIORITY OF 06 07 BY DUBIOUS MEANS WHICH EVERYBODY IN THE I.T. DEPT KNOWS.
RAJEEV MOHAN AND CATCH UP RULE JUDGEMENTS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY IF DEMOCRACY IS TO SURVIVE.
SINCE RAJEEV MOHAN JUDGEMENT AS WELL AS CATCH UP RULE JUDGEMENT OF SUPREME COURT HAD TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE ENTIRE I.T. DEPT AND A FRESH LIST AS ON 1.1.2016 IS TO BE PUBLISHED TILL THEN IN ANY CASE DPC FOR ITO TO ACIT SHALL BE DOUBTFUL AND LITIGATION WILL CONTINUE.
BEST OF ALL THINGS IS TO NULLIFY JUDGEMENT OF N R PARMAR TO RESTORE BACK THINGS.
IN ANY CASE DR ITIS WILL MOSTLY RETIRE AD PROMOTEE DC or one or TWO YEAR PROMOTEE JC.
Rajiv mohan and Trivedi are direct Inspectors and their case can not be used for deciding inter-se- seniority between direct and promotee inspectors. How can you compare yourself to direct inspectors. Agar sochane se khushi milti hai to IRS se comparison karke khush ho liya karo.
Then why did Supreme Court give decision in his favour ? Do you think supreme Court is mad ? In GOVT. Service junior will remain junior. Therefore Supreme Court rightly gave the decision of CATCH UP RULE. Why so frustrated over this correct decision. Al supreme Court decisions carry equal weightage. Every body is equal before law.
Rajiv mohan was inernal matter of DRIs and NRP was matter of DRI & PRI. Dont get confused
Dear knowledgeable sir please read all the three judgements carefully. All are Supreme Court decisions and are equally important and have to be implemented in toto. This is a democratic country. DRs are no son in laws of the country. Mostly all are DRs in their respective cadres.
1986 OM Null and void ab-initio by the SC in NRP case. Then automatically all the contents of fixing seniority of ICT, Compassionate appointed candidates are also void and non-est. So these candidates also treated as DR and NRP should be extended to them also.
1986 OM Null and void ab-initio by the SC in NRP case. Then automatically all the contents of fixing seniority of ICT, Compassionate appointed candidates are also void and non-est. So these candidates also treated as DR and NRP should be extended to them also.
It is correct that EKM CAT has vide order in OA NO. 180/00403/2015 AND MA NO 180/00815/2015 DATED 09/09/2015 has stayed the Final Seniority list of ITO's as on 01/01/2012 as well as the old ITO's seniority list as on 01/01/2009 till 29/10/2015 ie the date of next hearing
FURTHER PROMOTIONS FROM THE FINAL SENIORITY LIST OF ITO's AS ON 01/01/2012 AS WELL AS FROM THE OLD ITO's SENIORITY LIST AS ON 01/01/2009 HAS BEEN STAYED BY THE EKM CAT TILL 29/10/2015 ON WHICH DATE THE RESPONDENTS HAVE BEEN ASKED TO FURNISH REPLIES TO THE OA & MA's.
CAT's stay is not a difficult hurdle if CBDT wanted to ahead and hold DPC. This will be resolved before DPC. Dont worry friends.
THANK YOU RESPECTED SIR. GOD BLESS YOU. MAY YOU RETIRE AS CHAIRMAN CBDT NEW DELHI.
But the promotions will be ADHOC. Not counted for seniority. Also DPC will be subject to outcome of OA and MA and further subject to implementation of rajeev mohan as well as catch up rule judgements if Supreme Court.
When will rajeev mohan and catch up rule judgements be implemented ?
Rajiv Mohan has already been implemented. Ab catch up ki baari hai
Pl mention the advisory issued by cbdt or HRD or DOPT for implementing rajeev mohan
Another MA is being filed to implement catch up rule from the date N R PARMAR is implemented to ensure equitable justice.
Post a Comment