According to sources CBDT may constitute another committee to review the proposed allocation of posts by sub committee 1. as per information available with us, F.M. is deeply concerned over the grievance of anomaly by different regions including West Bengal, Mumbai, Bengaluru etc. and ordered to review the proposed allocation with a practical and justified manner. It is also reported that he is against any reduction of post in any region whatsoever. The new committee may be headed by DGIT (HRD).
It may kindly be noted that the news stated above is still to be authenticated by any official sources.
In the mean time JCA, West Bengal has suspended it's "Dharna" programme temporarily for two days. DGIT(HRD) is scheduled to visit Kolkata on 13th January and thereafter after taking stock of the developments, further action plan will be chalked out.
It may kindly be noted that the news stated above is still to be authenticated by any official sources.
In the mean time JCA, West Bengal has suspended it's "Dharna" programme temporarily for two days. DGIT(HRD) is scheduled to visit Kolkata on 13th January and thereafter after taking stock of the developments, further action plan will be chalked out.
7 comments:
it always happens like this.....senior officers has taken there bit of benefits from restructuring....now u agitate, appeal, beg, fight for your rights...
Like this, another Committee should also be constituted for review of report submitted by Sub-committee 6 especially with regard to setting up of Recruitment Rules for Group B & C. Keeping in view the decision of Supreme Court in the case of Parmar and also other factors, Date of Passing quota for promotion to ITI must be retained.
good, now other regions will follow suit and protest after this committee's proposal and ultimately restructuring may get delayed.
What happens to the clarification on Parmar Issue? Hope there is no committee/sub committee/core committee or any other committee in any other name for this. No word to explain the efficacy as well as the camaraderie.
No hope upto 31st March,2014
-Akhilesh Srivastava
Lucknow
All the best for early implementation
why are the representatives of ITEF and ITGOA in the various sub-committee silent about the developments taking pace. Are they mere spectators and signatories during the finalisation of the reports of the subc-ommittee, if not why are they not submitting their views and versions submitted to the respective sub-committees. I think if they were nominated/appointed to these sub-committee as a representative, they would also have the mandate from the respective federation. If so why now a difference emerges amongst its various units. Can anyone explain this.......
Post a Comment